Mohon tunggu...
Asep Setiawan
Asep Setiawan Mohon Tunggu... Membahasakan fantasi. Menulis untuk membentuk revolusi. Dedicated to the rebels.

Nalar, Nurani, Nyali. Curious, Critical, Rebellious. Mindset, Mindmap, Mindful

Selanjutnya

Tutup

Inovasi

Leadership Parameters and Bifurcation of Political Unrest: a Mathematical Formalism with Cases Study

16 September 2025   14:54 Diperbarui: 16 September 2025   14:54 82
+
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun
Kompasiana adalah platform blog. Konten ini menjadi tanggung jawab bloger dan tidak mewakili pandangan redaksi Kompas.
Lihat foto
Bagikan ide kreativitasmu dalam bentuk konten di Kompasiana | Sumber gambar: Freepik

An essential feature of our extended model is the variable H(t)H(t)H(t), representing the black horse potential---the latent probability that a new challenger or outsider figure rises when systemic instability creates political openings. Unlike trust (TTT), economic stress (EEE), or protest intensity (PPP), the black horse potential is not directly observable until crystallization occurs. Instead, it can be modeled as an emergent state variable driven by two forces: systemic instability and leadership weakness.

1. Governing mechanism

We extend the reduced system with a fourth equation:

H=PP+EELL(1T)HH,\dot H \;=\; \sigma_P \, P \;+\; \sigma_E \, E \;-\; \sigma_L \, L \,(1-T) \;-\; \gamma_H H,H=PP+EELL(1T)HH,

where:

P\sigma_PP weights protest intensity as a driver of alternative figure emergence;
E\sigma_EE links black horse probability to economic hardship;
L\sigma_LL measures legitimacy as a suppressor of outsider viability;
H\gamma_HH is a decay term reflecting natural dissipation of outsider momentum in stable contexts.
In this representation, HHH rises when protests intensify and the economy weakens, especially under low legitimacy. Conversely, high legitimacy dampens HHH, while stable conditions reduce it over time.

2. Simulation insights

Numerical simulations illustrate how H(t)H(t)H(t) behaves under different leadership profiles:

Soeharto. High legitimacy and repression kept HHH suppressed for decades. Only when E\mu_EE surged during the 1997--98 Asian Financial Crisis did HHH rise abruptly, enabling outsider figures to emerge (e.g., Reformasi leaders).
SBY. Sustained legitimacy and moderate narrative control kept HHH low, even amid shocks. Outsider momentum was weak, and no black horse displaced him.
Jokowi. Narrative saturation lowered protest intensity, but when legitimacy wavered, HHH rose intermittently---manifest in recurrent outsider challenges in elections, though none unseated him during stable phases.
Prabowo. Low legitimacy combined with fragile repression balance elevates baseline HHH. Simulations show that even moderate protests can sustain black horse potential, making the regime vulnerable to outsider competition (e.g., figures like Anies Baswedan or populist celebrities).
3. Interpretation

The emergence of a black horse is thus not random but structurally predictable: it occurs when systemic stress pushes the equilibrium past crit\mu_{\text{crit}}crit, creating a positive feedback loop in HHH. Leadership quality, particularly legitimacy, acts as the main suppressor. Therefore, our simulations suggest that outsider breakthroughs are most likely under regimes that combine low legitimacy with rising economic stress and poorly calibrated repression.

V. Case Study: Indonesia

Mohon tunggu...

Lihat Konten Inovasi Selengkapnya
Lihat Inovasi Selengkapnya
Beri Komentar
Berkomentarlah secara bijaksana dan bertanggung jawab. Komentar sepenuhnya menjadi tanggung jawab komentator seperti diatur dalam UU ITE

Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama untuk memberikan komentar!
LAPORKAN KONTEN
Alasan
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun