Mohon tunggu...
Asep Setiawan
Asep Setiawan Mohon Tunggu... Membahasakan fantasi. Menulis untuk membentuk revolusi. Dedicated to the rebels.

Nalar, Nurani, Nyali. Curious, Critical, Rebellious. Mindset, Mindmap, Mindful

Selanjutnya

Tutup

Inovasi

Adaptive Relational Zoning: a CAS Framework for Modelling Strategic Social Interaction

13 Juni 2025   13:09 Diperbarui: 13 Juni 2025   19:29 370
+
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun
Kompasiana adalah platform blog. Konten ini menjadi tanggung jawab bloger dan tidak mewakili pandangan redaksi Kompas.
Lihat foto
Inovasi. Sumber ilustrasi: PEXELS/Jcomp

4. Ethics and Tactical Flexibility

Importantly, the strategic use of zones does not promote manipulation. Rather, it acknowledges that in high-stakes, uncertain, or pluralistic environments, actors must balance competing moral, emotional, and strategic imperatives. The model thus offers a formal structure for what we term "tactical ethics"---decisions grounded in contextually informed, non-binary logic that respects both agentic autonomy and systemic integrity.

B. Dynamic Reclassification and Behavioral Adaptation

The Six-Zone Relational Model is intrinsically dynamic: it assumes that human relationships are fluid, temporally sensitive, and contextually contingent. As such, reclassification across zones is not a flaw or anomaly---it is a defining feature of the model. At the heart of this feature lies the principle that behavior must adapt strategically to shifts in relational variables over time.

1. Reclassification as a Function of Multivariable Flux

Each dyadic relational score, Rij(t)R_{ij}(t), results from a composite function of several weighted variables (e.g., trust, transparency, loyalty, emotional resonance, dissonance). As these variables fluctuate---due to external events, internal recalibrations, or third-party interference---the zone classification changes accordingly.

Examples:

A sudden violation of loyalty (V) or rise in perceived dissonance (V) may lower Rij(t)R_{ij}(t) enough to shift a relationship from the Green to the Yellow or Red Zone.
Conversely, restored transparency (V) or increased emotional signaling (V) can elevate trust and realign interaction, shifting a dyad from Red to Yellow or Green.
This reclassification process mirrors real-life experiences of relational reevaluation, where individuals update internal models of others based on new evidence or emotional recalibration.

2. Feedback Loops and Reflexivity

Because agents in the system are aware of one another's likely zones, the model introduces reflexivity---where anticipated classification may influence actual behavior. This can give rise to:

Positive feedback loops, where mutual trust leads to escalating alignment (e.g., from Yellow to Green to White).
Negative spirals, where misinterpretation of a shift to Yellow leads to defensive behaviors, which lower transparency, and precipitate a descent into the Red or Black Zones.
Reflexive awareness also permits strategic signaling: agents can modify behaviors (e.g., increase V or V) not merely to improve their own score but to alter the other agent's perception of the relational zone and invite reclassification.

Mohon tunggu...

Lihat Konten Inovasi Selengkapnya
Lihat Inovasi Selengkapnya
Beri Komentar
Berkomentarlah secara bijaksana dan bertanggung jawab. Komentar sepenuhnya menjadi tanggung jawab komentator seperti diatur dalam UU ITE

Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama untuk memberikan komentar!
LAPORKAN KONTEN
Alasan
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun