Mohon tunggu...
Asep Setiawan
Asep Setiawan Mohon Tunggu... Membahasakan fantasi. Menulis untuk membentuk revolusi. Dedicated to the rebels.

Nalar, Nurani, Nyali. Curious, Critical, Rebellious. Mindset, Mindmap, Mindful

Selanjutnya

Tutup

Inovasi

Adaptive Relational Zoning: a CAS Framework for Modelling Strategic Social Interaction

13 Juni 2025   13:09 Diperbarui: 13 Juni 2025   19:29 370
+
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun
Kompasiana adalah platform blog. Konten ini menjadi tanggung jawab bloger dan tidak mewakili pandangan redaksi Kompas.
Lihat foto
Inovasi. Sumber ilustrasi: PEXELS/Jcomp

Yellow

Green

Green

This matrix is generated by observing weekly/timely behavioral inputs and recalculating the relational score with decay-adjusted and reweighted variables, alongside volatility indicators.

Observations and Strategic Interpretation

1 B-D Shift: B's unilateral decision-making caused a sharp drop in V (Transparency) and V (Conflict behavior) from D's perspective, leading to a Red Zone reclassification. The volatility index BD(t)\sigma_{BD}(t) peaked at week 3, signaling relational instability.
2. C-E Stabilization: Despite initial unfamiliarity, consistent reliability and empathetic feedback increased V and V, leading C-E from Green to White Zone, indicating emergent high-trust alliance.
3. A-B Gradual Drift: Slight erosion in task alignment (V) and response time (V) moved the relationship toward Yellow, a warning signal for management to intervene before further decay.
4. D-F Rebalancing: After initial misalignment, mutual defense and shared frustration with leadership increased V and V scores, shifting the dyad from Yellow to Green.

Adaptive Implications

The simulation underscores the model's strategic capabilities:

Early detection of decaying ties before they reach toxic thresholds.
Tactical recommendations (e.g., empathy-based interventions or task reassignments).
Adaptive reweighting of variables based on evolving team context (e.g., increasing weight of V---conflict handling---in high-stress phases).
Such foresight enables preemptive leadership action, precision-targeted team therapy, or realignment of incentives, all grounded in quantifiable relational intelligence.

B. Case 2: Conflict Recovery in Personal Relationships

This simulation explores the relational dynamics within a dyadic personal relationship (e.g., close friendship or romantic partnership) that undergoes significant emotional turbulence due to a perceived betrayal event. Such a context highlights the model's sensitivity to temporal emotional variables, non-linear recovery trajectories, and adaptive reweighting mechanisms in rebuilding trust.

Mohon tunggu...

Lihat Konten Inovasi Selengkapnya
Lihat Inovasi Selengkapnya
Beri Komentar
Berkomentarlah secara bijaksana dan bertanggung jawab. Komentar sepenuhnya menjadi tanggung jawab komentator seperti diatur dalam UU ITE

Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama untuk memberikan komentar!
LAPORKAN KONTEN
Alasan
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun