Mohon tunggu...
Asep Setiawan
Asep Setiawan Mohon Tunggu... Membahasakan fantasi. Menulis untuk membentuk revolusi. Dedicated to the rebels.

Nalar, Nurani, Nyali. Curious, Critical, Rebellious. Mindset, Mindmap, Mindful

Selanjutnya

Tutup

Inovasi

Relational Zone Economics: Toward a Complex Adaptive Theory of Strategic Human Interaction in Economics System

25 Juni 2025   21:07 Diperbarui: 25 Juni 2025   21:07 335
+
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun
Kompasiana adalah platform blog. Konten ini menjadi tanggung jawab bloger dan tidak mewakili pandangan redaksi Kompas.
Lihat foto
Bagikan ide kreativitasmu dalam bentuk konten di Kompasiana | Sumber gambar: Freepik

Zij(t){W,G,Y,R,B,C}Z_{ij}(t) \in \{W, G, Y, R, B, C\}: The current relational zone (White, Green, Yellow, Red, Black, Clear),
\gamma: Rationality/temperature parameter (similar to logit choice models),
U~i(Zij)\tilde{U}_i(\cdot | Z_{ij}): Augmented utility conditioned on current zone,
P(siZij(t))P(s_i | Z_{ij}(t)): Likelihood of strategy sis_i given the zone agent ii assigns to agent jj.
Thus, strategy selection is not purely payoff-maximizing, but zone-sensitive. For example:

In Green Zone, cooperation strategies (e.g., Tit-for-Tat) become highly probable.
In Yellow Zone, agents may select ambiguous or mixed strategies (e.g., Grim Trigger, Suspicious Tit-for-Tat).
In Black Zone, retaliatory or destructive strategies dominate.
3. Transition Coupling: Payoff-to-Zone Feedback

The framework also accommodates bidirectional feedback between strategies/payoffs and relational zones. Specifically, we define:

dRij(t)dt=f(i(t),j(t),si(t),sj(t))+Iij(t)Lij(t)\frac{dR_{ij}(t)}{dt} = \alpha \cdot f\left( \pi_i(t), \pi_j(t), s_i(t), s_j(t) \right) + \lambda \cdot I_{ij}(t) - \delta \cdot L_{ij}(t)

Where:

\alpha: Responsiveness of relationship to payoff and strategy dynamics.
f()f(\cdot): A function mapping payoffs and strategic behavior to relational impact (e.g., defecting in cooperative expectation sharp decrease in RR).
Lij(t)\delta \cdot L_{ij}(t): Decay due to latent distrust, memory of past betrayal, or observed inconsistency.
This equation describes relational inertia and momentum: the result of strategies not only impacts current outcomes but reconfigures the relational space of future interactions.

Theoretical Implications:

Challenging the Stationarity Assumption: Nash Equilibrium assumes strategic consistency under static payoffs. Our model reveals how zone drift and relational volatility disrupt equilibrium persistence.
Incorporating Ambiguity and Memory: Repeated games often presume perfect recall or discounting. Our model introduces nonlinear memory, zone stickiness, and relational hysteresis.
From Equilibrium to Trajectory: Rather than solving for a fixed point (Nash, Subgame Perfect Equilibrium), RZE proposes that economic behavior unfolds as trajectories through a zone landscape --- with path-dependence, emergent trust, betrayal cascades, or institutional lock-in.

CHAPTER 5. Simulation and Analysis

A. Multi-Zone Agent Simulation in Long-Term Investment

1. Rationale for Simulation Approach

Mohon tunggu...

Lihat Konten Inovasi Selengkapnya
Lihat Inovasi Selengkapnya
Beri Komentar
Berkomentarlah secara bijaksana dan bertanggung jawab. Komentar sepenuhnya menjadi tanggung jawab komentator seperti diatur dalam UU ITE

Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama untuk memberikan komentar!
LAPORKAN KONTEN
Alasan
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun