Mohon tunggu...
Asep Setiawan
Asep Setiawan Mohon Tunggu... Membahasakan fantasi. Menulis untuk membentuk revolusi. Dedicated to the rebels.

Nalar, Nurani, Nyali. Curious, Critical, Rebellious. Mindset, Mindmap, Mindful

Selanjutnya

Tutup

Inovasi

Adaptive Relational Zoning: a CAS Framework for Modelling Strategic Social Interaction

13 Juni 2025   13:09 Diperbarui: 13 Juni 2025   19:29 371
+
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun
Kompasiana adalah platform blog. Konten ini menjadi tanggung jawab bloger dan tidak mewakili pandangan redaksi Kompas.
Lihat foto
Bagikan ide kreativitasmu dalam bentuk konten di Kompasiana | Sumber gambar: Freepik

By integrating these variables, the model avoids reductionist typologies and instead provides a multi-dimensional, adaptive measure of relational state. The combination of affective, cognitive, and strategic components allows the score Rij(t)R_{ij}(t) to capture emergent dynamics, hysteresis effects, and sudden shifts in relational posture.

This formalism thus offers a computationally tractable yet psychologically nuanced framework suitable for real-world simulation, predictive analytics, and relational strategy optimization.

C. Adaptation Mechanisms and Temporal Adjustments

The dynamic nature of human relationships demands not only real-time assessments of relational variables but also mechanisms for adaptation over time. Relationships are not static---they evolve through interaction, feedback, and contextual shifts. Accordingly, our model integrates temporal sensitivity and adaptive recalibration, aligning with principles from Complex Adaptive Systems (Holland, 1992) and bounded rationality (Simon). This section outlines how the model dynamically adjusts relational assessments across time tt, emphasizing hysteresis effects, memory decay, volatility detection, and tactical recalibration.

1. Temporal Sensitivity and Memory Decay

Each relational variable Vk,ij(t)V_{k,ij}(t) is not equally influential across all time points. The model applies a decay function to reflect the cognitive and emotional fading of events, such that:

Vk,ij(t)=Vk,ij(t1)ekt+Vk,ij(t)V_{k,ij}(t) = V_{k,ij}(t - 1) \cdot e^{-\lambda_k \Delta t} + \Delta V_{k,ij}(t)

where k\lambda_k is a variable-specific decay constant and Vk,ij(t)\Delta V_{k,ij}(t) represents new input. Variables such as trust and betrayal may decay more slowly than others, preserving their influence across time, consistent with neurocognitive research on memory consolidation and emotional salience.

This allows the model to balance recency and legacy, enabling agents to "forgive" over time while still retaining critical structural memory of prior events.

2. Hysteresis and Path-Dependence

Unlike linear systems, social relationships often exhibit hysteresis---the path taken matters. For example, a breach of trust may lower the relational score Rij(t)R_{ij}(t) more rapidly than a similar gain in trust raises it. This is modeled through asymmetric adjustment functions:

Mohon tunggu...

Lihat Konten Inovasi Selengkapnya
Lihat Inovasi Selengkapnya
Beri Komentar
Berkomentarlah secara bijaksana dan bertanggung jawab. Komentar sepenuhnya menjadi tanggung jawab komentator seperti diatur dalam UU ITE

Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama untuk memberikan komentar!
LAPORKAN KONTEN
Alasan
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun