It calls into question:
The limits of discourse ethics (Habermas),
The blind spots of secular liberalism,
-
The epistemic closure of ideological systems.
Yet, its very indeterminacy demands humility and caution---it cannot serve as a unilateral moral justification, but must be tested against lived consequences and dialogical openness.
c) Deliberation As Layer Navigation
Rather than endorsing one universal procedure of deliberation, SMH offers a layer-sensitive model:
At Layer 1: Deliberation may involve affective attunement and emotional honesty,
At Layer 2: Cultural mediation and community consensus,
At Layer 3: Textual hermeneutics and institutional consultation,
At Layer 4: Ideological critique and political discourse analysis,
-
Beri Komentar
Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama untuk memberikan komentar!