Legitimizing Claims for "Crisis" Leadership in Global Governance

Global governance substance attention into academic diciplines : the field of discourse studies with focus in particular ways with a differentiate actors that are positioned in specific text; crises have led to renewed toward the efficacy and legitimacy of contemporary forms. 

Issue of crisis leadership in international politics escalate into academic scrutiny. Leadership is a central element of any form of governance or can be seen as critical moments. Legitimation texted as a complex social act which is exercised by text and talk. Legitimation defined as "Discourse" which justifies and explains social activity and diserve motivation and justification for speakers past or future actions. In political science, questions of legitimation had been focused on research. 

On the other side, an ongoing debate about precisely contitutes legitimacy and constructed with various audiences by whom and the purposes. A tremendous amount of discourse analytic research has identified and strained discussed various legitimization strategies and employed the leading political agents.

In crises time, political agents preserve to requires speedy instead popular policy responses include close relationship between leadership and legitimacy as important particular.

 Relationship between crisis and leadership can be understood as a specific mode of governance to increases ability of political agents to follow up specific interests. In comparing study speeches especially by political and corporate leaders encourage contemporary leaders to orchestrating a global civil war and permanently maintain the sovereignty. Kerr stated both leaders in political and corporate are constantly constructing also imagining crises to legitimize and authenticating their leadership. A research texted on issues of legitimization and leadership primarily attention to emergency politics or as well known as "Call to arms speeches". 

A the end of Cold War, hopes of a decline in threat of nuclear weapons topic. Although the nuclear arsenals of USA and Uni Soviet, the competition have been reduced slowly. The threat by proliferation nuclear weapons are capable to posed countries and non-state actors. Early 1990s whole regimes perceived to operate out of the international system norms that had been a concern. In the past, both Iran and North Korea have been portrayed as violators and grow up significant international sanction due to contravene the nuclear proliferation regime whose build up Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (1968) and Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (1996).

Leadership is a multi complex, and it is not surprising if there is little agreement among scholars about what it is should be in scope. Now, leadership oftenly focused on material properties especially attributes and actions. Next, constitutes leadership reveals a numeorus of the activities that would be identified to be an index of leadership, likes create a vision or ratified decisions. Briefly, leadership is interactional organized in speech also increasing acknowledgement for the relevance of forested talk in leadership research or researchers across different disciplines and recognize benefits that offered with analytical approaches. The teoritical framework expand and address some challenges to analysing about discourse of leadership called "Discursive Leadership". This is relatively new approach positions from opposition into traditional leadership psychology. 

Of equal importance, leadership psychology is mostly concerned to perceptions and self-reflections whereas a discursive leadership only have focused on "In use" language and can be use to explores specific processes which is through communicated and accomplished the discourse. It is mean research in discursive leadership has no longer interest establishing "Grand Theories of Leadership".

Access to empirical evidence is the way to claim leadership are legitimized and made in relation to control the global nuclear weapons. Based  from three complementary analysis of relevant resolution by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) using qualitative and corpus analysis techniques. A discourse analize two prominent speeches given by members of the US administration whose relevant fora in the global arena and corpus analysis of related accounts published either side of the Atlantic. An official documents by UNSC plays a dominant political role. Due to political speech, leadership make up into more explicit manner.

In summary, crises of the global governance and leadership both has serve the norm and being attention into academic field. Leadership closely linked to legitimation which is understanding as a discourse to explain social activity, diserve motivation and justification. Leadership in crisis time require velocity policy as important particular because it is have a multi complex with analytical approaches. Crisis and leadership have to be use as a specific mode of governance indeed to increases ability of political agents about specific interests. Last word, politician plays a role vital in order to formulating and establishing nuclear proliferation policies. In addition, state must pay attention to the regional or international treaties and conventions.