Mohon tunggu...
TEGUH IMAN SANTOSO
TEGUH IMAN SANTOSO Mohon Tunggu... Dosen

I am Ordinary man.

Selanjutnya

Tutup

Hukum

Roy Suryo;s Analysis of Fake Diplomas at the crime Investigation Departmet

13 Juli 2025   10:37 Diperbarui: 13 Juli 2025   10:37 89
+
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun
Kompasiana adalah platform blog. Konten ini menjadi tanggung jawab bloger dan tidak mewakili pandangan redaksi Kompas.
Lihat foto
Bagikan ide kreativitasmu dalam bentuk konten di Kompasiana | Sumber gambar: Freepik

Castro, R. Q., & AuYongOliveira, M. (2021). Blockchain and Higher Education Diplomas [Review of Blockchain and Higher Education Diplomas]. European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education, 11(1), 154. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11010013 

Chaniago, N., Sukarno, P., & Wardana, A. A. (2021). Electronic document authenticity verification of diploma and transcript using smart contract on Ethereum blockchain. Register Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 7(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.26594/register.v7i2.1959 

Dhakal, R. K. (2018). Responsible Practice of Research: Safeguarding Research Integrity and Publication Ethics. Journal of Education and Research, 6(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v6i2.22144 

DuBois, J. M., Anderson, E. E., Chibnall, J. T., Carroll, K., Gibb, T., Ogbuka, C., & Rubbelke, T. S. (2013). Understanding Research Misconduct: A Comparative Analysis of 120 Cases of Professional Wrongdoing [Review of Understanding Research Misconduct: A Comparative Analysis of 120 Cases of Professional Wrongdoing]. Accountability in Research, 20, 320. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2013.822248 

Edwards, M., & Roy, S. (2016). Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering Science, 34(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2016.0223 

Fanelli, D. (2009). How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data [Review of How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data]. PLoS ONE, 4(5). Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738 

Garwe, E. C. (2015). Qualification, Award and Recognition Fraud in Higher Education in Zimbabwe. Journal of Studies in Education, 5(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v5i2.7456 

Gopalakrishna, G., Riet, G. ter, Vink, G., Stoop, I., Wicherts, J. M., & Bouter, L. M. (2022). Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands. PLoS ONE, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263023 

Gross, C. G. (2015). Scientific Misconduct [Review of Scientific Misconduct]. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 693. Annual Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033437 

Ling, M. H. (2018). Science/Education Portraits III: Perceived Prevalence of Data Fabrication and/or Falsification in Research. Advances in Biotechnology & Microbiology, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.19080/aibm.2018.11.555824 

Lose, G., & Klarskov, N. (2017). Why published research is untrustworthy. In International Urogynecology Journal (Vol. 28, Issue 9, p. 1271). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3389-1 

HALAMAN :
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
Mohon tunggu...

Lihat Konten Hukum Selengkapnya
Lihat Hukum Selengkapnya
Beri Komentar
Berkomentarlah secara bijaksana dan bertanggung jawab. Komentar sepenuhnya menjadi tanggung jawab komentator seperti diatur dalam UU ITE

Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama untuk memberikan komentar!
LAPORKAN KONTEN
Alasan
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun