Why Paradigms, and Concept Important in Quantitative and Qualitative Research?

Research in educational management is not merely about collecting data; it is also based on clear paradigms, concepts, and methodologies. By understanding the differences between quantitative and qualitative research, problem formulation, and the translation of constructs into indicators and variables, research can proceed more systematically and validly. Through this discussion, readers are expected to gain a comprehensive picture of the foundations of research and see how it contributes significantly to educational theory, policy, and practice.

First, research in both education and social sciences has a foundation built through paradigms, axioms, concepts, and research variables. Quantitative research is based on a positivistic paradigm that emphasizes objectivity, measurement, and generalizability. Its focus is on testing hypotheses and discovering causal relationships through numerical data. In contrast, qualitative research uses a constructivist paradigm with an emphasis on meaning, experience, and social interaction. Validity in quantitative research is maintained through instrument reliability, while in qualitative research it is strengthened through triangulation. These differences demonstrate that both approaches have their respective strengths and limitations in generating knowledge.

Second, Every research project begins with a clear, specific, and relevant problem. This problem guides the researcher in selecting the appropriate method. To strengthen the research foundation, concepts are explained in the form of conceptual definitions, which are then translated into operational definitions so they can be measured systematically. The close relationship between problems and concepts ensures that research focuses on the desired objectives and has a strong scientific basis.

Third, In addition to problems and concepts, research also recognizes constructs, which are abstract representations of phenomena such as motivation, leadership, or job satisfaction. For constructs to be researched, they need to be translated into more concrete indicators through an operationalization process. In this way, abstract concepts are transformed into measurable variables. Indicator validity plays a crucial role in ensuring that the data truly reflects the construct being studied, thus serving as a bridge between theory and empirical facts.

Fourth, The phenomena occurring in the field are then represented in the form of data. This data is then managed through variables, whether as independent, dependent, moderator, or control variables. To ensure accuracy, each variable must be measured on an appropriate scale, ranging from nominal, ordinal, interval, to ratio. Through proper variable management, data can be analyzed appropriately to produce valid and accountable research conclusions.

In conclusion,  paradigms, axioms, concepts, constructs, indicators, phenomena, data, and variables are essential foundations in research. A quantitative approach that emphasizes objectivity and numbers complements a qualitative approach that emphasizes meaning and experience. When combined, the two can produce more comprehensive, valid, and applicable research for educational and policy development.

Note: This article is a review of Part 5 (Paradigms, Axioms, and Special Concepts of Quantitative and Qualitative Research) of the Management Research Methods course, taught by Prof. Dr. H. A. Rusdiana, M.M. (https://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/id/eprint/121673)

CV (Sumber: Personal Document)