Mohon tunggu...
TEGUH IMAN SANTOSO
TEGUH IMAN SANTOSO Mohon Tunggu... Dosen

I am Ordinary man.

Selanjutnya

Tutup

Hukum

Budi Arie's Evidence in Online Gambling Case

7 Juli 2025   17:30 Diperbarui: 7 Juli 2025   17:30 54
+
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun
Kompasiana adalah platform blog. Konten ini menjadi tanggung jawab bloger dan tidak mewakili pandangan redaksi Kompas.
Lihat foto
Hukum. Sumber ilustrasi: FREEPIK/Freepik

Budi Arie's Evidence in Online Gambling Case

The discourse surrounding online gambling has intensified, particularly with figures like Budi Arie presenting purported solid evidence to bolster arguments against its proliferation. This necessitates a comprehensive examination of the multifaceted implications of online gambling, encompassing its societal impact, economic dimensions, and legal ramifications (Laras et al., 2024). The evolution of gambling from traditional venues to online platforms has been expedited by technological advancements, presenting novel challenges for regulators and law enforcement agencies (Pradika, 2024). The increased accessibility, driven by widespread internet access and mobile technologies, has fueled concerns about the potential exacerbation of gambling-related problems (Hing et al., 2017). Governmental bodies and regulatory institutions have implemented stringent measures pertaining to the geographical limitations and financial constraints associated with gambling activities (Min et al., 2021). The rise of online gambling has also transformed the landscape of criminal activities, with an increase in fraud, money laundering, and other illicit activities (Pradika, 2024).

The ubiquity of online gambling platforms, although seemingly pervasive, does not necessarily translate into widespread engagement across populations (James et al., 2016). Notably, a considerable portion of the populace remains either disengaged or only peripherally involved in online gambling activities. The expansion of legalized gambling has been flagged as a potential public health concern (GuillouLandreat et al., 2021). It has been linked to increased rates of gambling addiction and associated social ills. The regulation of online gambling is a complex undertaking, particularly in jurisdictions with established prohibitionist regimes (Sparrow, 2009). Legal frameworks often struggle to keep pace with the rapidly evolving technological landscape, leading to loopholes and enforcement challenges (Zaenudin & Faridah, 2022). The interplay between technological advancements and regulatory frameworks is a critical factor in determining the effectiveness of measures aimed at curbing illegal gambling activities.

The digital convergence, facilitated by the integration of social media and online gaming platforms, has broadened the gambling industry's reach, especially among younger demographics (Lawn et al., 2020). This convergence warrants scrutiny due to the potential for social influence and peer pressure to normalize gambling behaviors (Kawshar Jahan Fakir, 2023). Online gambling platforms often employ sophisticated marketing strategies to attract and retain customers. These strategies may include promotional offers, loyalty programs, and personalized advertising (GuillouLandreat et al., 2021). The psychological underpinnings of gambling behavior are complex and multifaceted, involving cognitive biases, reinforcement mechanisms, and individual differences in risk perception. Gambling disorder is characterized by a preoccupation with gambling and persistence and lack of control despite wide-spread negative consequences (Gainsbury et al., 2020). Online gambling is a significant concern with psychological, social, and economic dimensions that require interdisciplinary insights and comprehensive strategies (Chamberlain et al., 2017).

Internet addiction, characterized by an inability to control internet use leading to utilitarian impairment and increased addictive symptomatology, is a growing concern, particularly among students who disproportionately use the internet (Kawshar Jahan Fakir, 2023). The risk of cyberbullying is exacerbated by both social anxiety and internet addiction, highlighting the complex interplay between online behavior and mental health (Kawshar Jahan Fakir, 2023). The conceptualization of internet addiction remains contentious, with debates focusing on whether it should be classified as a distinct disorder or as a manifestation of underlying psychological issues. Moreover, some argue the addictiveness of the Internet as a medium is conceptually unsound (James et al., 2016).  Further research is needed to better understand the nature and scope of internet addiction, as well as to develop effective prevention and intervention strategies (Christakis, 2010).

The effect of non-learning internet use on cyberbullying perpetration suggests that time spent online for non-academic purposes is associated with increased likelihood of engaging in cyberbullying. The longer students spend online for non-learning activities, the more prone they may be to cyberbullying others (Zhong et al., 2021). This underscores the importance of educating students about responsible internet use and the potential consequences of their online actions. It suggests that online disinhibition, where individuals feel less constrained in their behavior online, may contribute to cyberbullying (Zhong et al., 2021). Ultimately, addressing cyberbullying requires a multi-faceted approach that encompasses education, prevention, and intervention strategies. The development of technologies and Internet availability has made it easy for students to demonstrate their knowledge, understanding, and skills (Kawshar Jahan Fakir, 2023).

References

Chamberlain, S. R., Redden, S. A., Leppink, E. W., & Grant, J. E. (2017). Problematic internet use in gamblers: impact on clinical and cognitive measures. CNS Spectrums, 22(6), 495. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1092852917000037 

Christakis, D. (2010). Internet addiction: a 21stcentury epidemic? In BMC Medicine (Vol. 8, Issue 1). BioMed Central. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-61 

Gainsbury, S., Black, N., Blaszczynski, A., Callaghan, S., Clancey, G., Starevi, V., & Tymula, A. (2020). Reducing Internet Gambling Harms Using Behavioral Science: A Stakeholder Framework. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.598589 

GuillouLandreat, M., GallopelMorvan, K., Lever, D., Goff, D. L., & Reste, J. Y. L. (2021). Gambling Marketing Strategies and the Internet: What Do We Know? A Systematic Review [Review of Gambling Marketing Strategies and the Internet: What Do We Know? A Systematic Review]. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. Frontiers Media. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.583817 

HALAMAN :
  1. 1
  2. 2
Mohon tunggu...

Lihat Konten Hukum Selengkapnya
Lihat Hukum Selengkapnya
Beri Komentar
Berkomentarlah secara bijaksana dan bertanggung jawab. Komentar sepenuhnya menjadi tanggung jawab komentator seperti diatur dalam UU ITE

Belum ada komentar. Jadilah yang pertama untuk memberikan komentar!
LAPORKAN KONTEN
Alasan
Laporkan Konten
Laporkan Akun