Exploring Paradigms, Axioms, and Spesific Concepts in Quantitative Research

By: Syakila Roudotul Zannah/Student Strata 1 at the Faculty of Teacher Training Education, Islamic Education Management Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic University, Bandung 5/C 1232010077

Scientific research in the context of social and educational studies begins with real phenomena that attract attention and become the main focus. In these phenomena, there are fundamental differences in assumptions: quantitative research adheres to a single reality that can be measured numerically, qualitative research assumes that reality is plural and socially constructed. This paradigm difference raises methodological issues related to how to identify, measure, and validate abstract concepts into credible indicators and data. The purpose of this paper is to systematically present the philosophical basis, conceptualization and operationalization processes, and the importance of measurement scales and validity strategies in producing accurate, structured, and scientifically accountable findings.

First, quantitative and qualitative research are two fundamental approaches in social and educational research that complement each other but are based on different paradigms and axioms. Quantitative its axiom is that reality is singular and measurable. In contrast, qualitative research its axiom is that reality is plural and socially constructed. These two approaches use different methodologies and validity strategies: quantitative research relies on the validity and reliability of instruments, while qualitative research uses triangulation and data transparency to ensure the scientific quality and accountability of research results.

Second, the effectiveness of research begins with the identification problems. These problems are then examined through relevant key concepts. The first stage involves conceptual definition, which is a theoretical and abstract explanation of the concept, validated by referring to academic literature to establish a scientific basis. Next, the concept is transformed into an Operational Definition, which serves as a practical guide on how the concept will be measured or observed in the field, often through tangible indicators. This entire process is reinforced by the Relationship between the Problem and the Concept, which ensures that the focus of the research is rooted in a solid theoretical framework.

Third, constructs, as abstract concepts in theory that cannot be measured directly, are an essential starting point in research. From these constructs, specific and measurable variable indicators are derived, which serve as a bridge connecting abstract theoretical ideas with concrete empirical data or field facts. The subsequent operationalization process transforms these measurable indicators into structured data collection instruments. This entire process requires indicator validity that indicators truly reflect and represent the original construct. This is crucial to ensure that the measurements taken are accurate, valid, and scientifically accountable from the theoretical framework to the reality of the data.

Fourth, research begins with a phenomenon, namely a real symptom or event that becomes the main focus, which is then converted into valid and reliable data. The core of analysis, especially quantitative research, lies in variables, which are characteristics that can change and be classified as independent, dependent, moderator, mediator, and control. These three components phenomena as the source of the problem, data as the empirical foundation, and variables as the tools for testing hypotheses are highly dependent on the appropriate measurement scale: nominal (categories without order), ordinal (categories with order), interval (equal distances without absolute zero), and ratio (equal distances with absolute zero). These scales determine the appropriate type of statistical analysis.

The scientific and naturalistic paradigms are fundamental concepts for students in conducting research. Quantitative Research and Qualitative Research are two fundamental approaches that view reality differently, but both aim to produce scientifically accountable findings. Effective research begins with clear Problem Identification, then transforms Abstract Concepts (Constructs) through Conceptual Definitions into practical Operational Definitions by deriving specific Variable Indicators. This process is crucial because it ensures that theoretical ideas are validly connected (Indicator Validity) with field data. 

____________

*) This text is presented from the Teaching Module of the Research Methodology Course in Islamic Educational Management Part 5 Lecturer: Prof. Dr. H. A. Rusdiana., M.M. (https://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/id/eprint/121673)