I propose, with careful academic consideration, that it is the duty of President Jokowi to evaluate the credibility of psychologists who engage in fallacious reasoning (shortcutting) such as Boyke.
Boyke, as a psychologist, often invokes his "scientific basis" to argue that being LGBT is merely a sexual orientation deviation and not a pathology, likening it to a preference for colors such as red or white. But Boyke, does he believe that God, in His wisdom, would punish with the harshest of punishments in history those who merely have a sexual orientation deviation? Scientific truth must be objective, based on empirical logic. Therefore, let us examine the medical symptoms empirically and psychologically, and draw conclusions accordingly.
Scientific truth does not emerge from conformity to prevailing societal norms; such an approach constitutes a fallacious shortcut in reasoning, not a scientific endeavor. The political version of truth propagated by LGBT propaganda, symbolized by the rainbow and championed by various Western institutions, is not scientific truth. Even if one were to reference the American DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), no amount of repetition will change the fact that the reproductive organs will not miraculously relocate to the anus (where is your medical school?). There is no pregnancy resulting from anal intercourse between men. Fetishism, such as sexual object deviation towards the Eiffel Tower or a chair, is considered pathological precisely because those objects are not reproductive organs and pose risks to both psychological and medical health. Likewise, anal sex among men leads to numerous health risks.
Psychological abnormalities fall into three categories: statistical, normative, and pathological. In countries like the United States, Germany, and France, LGBT individuals may be considered normal statistically and normatively because their societies accept LGBT individuals and their legal systems have discarded Christian scriptures as the foundation for law, opting instead for secularism and atheism after the collapse of European monarchies post-World War I.
Our psychologists' minds have been poisoned by the philosophical truths of cultural studies, wherein idiographic data is brought into psychological and medical philosophical realms dominated by semi-nomothetic and nomothetic/definite data. This results in cultural deconstruction paradigms à la Derrida being applied to social sciences, undermining empiricism, Baconian, and positivist principles.
The tangible consequences of this philosophical misapproach are the emergence of peculiar individuals masquerading as psychological scholars, claiming expertise from strange campuses, leading people astray.
Thus, while LGBT may never be considered normal within the realm of scientific truth, it may be deemed so within the political realm of Europe—not the world, but Europe—because if Europe is deemed the epitome of scientific advancement, we must blindly (fanatically) follow suit. Russia, a country at the forefront of high technology and scientific advancement, declares LGBT individuals abnormal normatively, statistically, and pathologically.
Boyke's assertion that LGBT is not an abnormal form of pathology, when pathology or disease is clearly empirical, is an egregious error, not scientific truth. How can one claim that the act of sperm entering a man's intestines is not pathological medically and psychologically? What is the empirical logic behind such a claim?
By relying solely on the majority consensus of Western psychologists, following Western legal products, and declaring such conformity as scientific truth, one demonstrates a lack of critical thinking. Even the most naive individual entering a university understands that the bandwagon effect is not scientific truth. It is folly, a shortcut in reasoning, and a confusion of thought propagated by this nation. If the experts themselves are prone to fallacies in scientific understanding, what then of the people? President Jokowi, safeguard the people from demagoguery. If you remain silent in the face of such campaigns, then you...
