Law Enforcement In Indonesia

The Law in Indonesia today are often drawn criticism than praise. Various criticisms directed at both related to law enforcement, awareness of the law, the quality of the law, obscurity of the law relating to the process of law and also weak implementation of the rules. 

The critique so often made with regard to the rule of law in Indonesia. Most of our societies, saying that the law in Indonesia can be purchased, who has his name and power, which has a lot of money should be safe from harm the law even though the country be broken. So the law in Indonesia are often described as bamboo "Runcing Kebawah, Tumpul Keatas". 

For the example in case Nenek Minah who took three rounds of cocoa in Purbalingga, which eventually directly given the punishment as severe. In contrast to a case carried out by officials in charge of corruption to billions of dollars or artists of the capital city who use drugs, only be sanctioned lightly. 

That's what makes the community sees that the law can be purchased and law enforcement officials are not be expected to do law enforcement in a thorough and fair. So far, the law won't just run as a routine a mere but but also being played like the merchandise. The law should be a renewal of the community, has turned into a kind of a killing machine because they were driven by the law.

The conditions are so bad that would be a very major effect on health and strength of the democratic Indonesia. Mental damage the law enforcement trade in the law is synonymous with wounding. Take out justice or be unfair of course a reckless act against the will of the people. 

In certain circumstances, when justice continue to be avoided is not impossible defence and security of the nation at stake. Injustice will trigger any kind of action naturally in the form of resistance or defense that can be realized in various acts anarchist or violence is counter-productive to the development of the nation.